Is sales volume the most important number to determine success in sales?

1. Is the better sales person the one with the more sales volume or the one with more sale units sold and closed?

2. Where does profitability enter the picture? Does it have any importance?

3. Should the amount of time actually worked be considered to compare an agent’s ability?

4. What is the true quality of life for the agent, i.e. health, time worked vs. time off?

5. How does quality of service to clients factor in?

6. Are we taking the steps to achieve financial independence based on the individual definition?

Let’s take a look at the value of these questions, I believe you will have a different perspective of sales volume when you look clearly at these questions.

Is the better sales person the one with the higher sales volume or the one with more sale units sold and closed?

My position is they both possess merit for what they do. The one with the highest sales volume has a tendency to be placed on a pedestal and the one with the most units sold about halfway up. In some cases sales volume can reflect the value of the market, not the value of the agent. For example, one agent’s average price range is $100,000, so his average commission check is $3,000. That agent closes 65 deals a year and earns a gross commission of $195,000. Across town there is another agent whose average price is $300,000, so the average commission check is $9,000. This agent closes 25 transactions a year and also earns a gross commission of $225,000. Who has more options in his business and may be a better salesperson? I think there are strengths to both. Agent A who does 65 deals only needs to raise his sales price because he already knows how to achieve 65 closed sales per year. He has the skills to close 65 transactions. He understands the process and if he has set up his business properly, he only needs to apply his philosophy and business in a higher sales price range to earn more income. He also did almost three times as many transactions. Usually Agent B with the higher commission earned receives all the rewards from peers, brokers, owners, and the company. Agent B is held in high esteem and reverence because he was the high producer in the office. Agent B has a good business but only sold two homes per month. (By most sales standards not an earth-shattering mark.) Agent B will also need to learn to do more transactions to increase his business, a far harder proposition. Which one really has a business that is posed to go to the next level?

Where does profitability enter the picture? Does it have any importance?

In my career of selling real estate, coaching, and speaking, I have known many agents who make a tremendous gross income, but have little net income. They spend it all back into their business through gimmicks, marketing, gifts, mailings, advertising, overpaying staff, etc. They make decisions based on the idea that if I get one more transactions per month it will pay for this new gimmick. The unfortunate thing is that they evaluate many parts of their business that way. They have five to ten items they evaluate that way. Suddenly they need about what they make monthly to cover those gimmicks. Every new idea must pay for itself plus generate a return or profit. I wanted at least ten times return for any investments, so if I spent $1,000 on a new idea, I wanted to receive $10,000 in return from it. Most agents do not factor their time or the staff’s time into the cost of this new idea. That is a legitimate cost that must be added to the cost. For example, the cost to mail something is not just the cost of the stamp like most agents would factor. It’s the cost of the letterhead, envelope, stamp, label, and staff time to prepare it and your time to oversee the process. That’s the overall cost. Then you want a 10 times return on the whole cost. This is the only way to evaluate to insure you make a profit. We all work too hard to only earn wages and not profits.

Many agents have bought themselves a job and never make a profit. A wise man once said, "Profits are better than wages." Profits continue on, they are the extra you have after you pay your wages and all your bills. Profits, if invested, beget more profits, which create financial independence. Wages merely cover the monthly bills.

Agents need to view the whole picture, the gross and the net. If you want the true reality after all the hype and fluff of sales volume, gross commission earned, and all the other ego stroking we do, look at line 31 on your federal tax return. That is reality. That is what you truly made for your labor last year. Do not kid yourself! What you are taxed on, is what you made.

Should the amount of time actually worked be considered to compare an agents' ability?

I know many agents who work six to seven days a week to produce their income. If they factored the actual time versus what they earned, they would be sick. Their actual per hour wage is nothing to get excited about. In fact, if you asked them if they would work and do what they do for that wage, they would say, "No." If you want real truth, divide your time by line 31 on your federal income tax form. That is what you truly make per hour. That is after all your expenses to run the business and your personal employee taxes. That is what you would earn if you worked for an actual company. For some people, this exercise is too scary to even imagine.

I think we all can do more in less time. As a personal example, I switched over four years ago to a four-day work week, Monday through Thursday. My production increased over 30% each year compared to the previous year. I reduced my time working by at least one full day and I was rewarded with a financial increase. My skills improved exponentially, and my focus and concentration intensified. I also re-claimed my life for myself and my family. I was able to spend three days a week with my family. I also increased my time investment in personal development, which leads me to my next question:

What is the true quality of life for the agent, i.e. health, time worked vs. time off?

You cannot be a seven days a week wonder forever. At some point you need to reclaim your life. You have to control your clients and the other agents. My philosophy is that earning large sums of money is the easiest area of your life to improve. Working to improve your spiritual, mental, physical, family, and financial areas are far more difficult.

When you schedule your time off and place the same value on it as you do your work time, you will have the opportunity to reclaim your life. Once you do that your productivity will increase dramatically during your work time. The value of my time with my family is worth more than my work time. If you have that philosophy, you will focus on your family when away from work and focus on work when at work. It is clearly a philosophy you need to implant in your mind. While many agents are at work, they think they should be at home. When they are at home, they are mentally reviewing their work rather than focusing on their spouse and children. Wherever you are, be there!

How does quality of service to clients factor in?

To create a sustainable business you need to take care of your clients. The agent who continually works with new clients and rarely gets referral or repeat business is lacking in service. We all need to spend some of our day finding new clients. Long-term success comes from repeat and referral business from clients who are already sold on our service. Are you doing the job you were hired to do? Do you provide the best service you can utilize in the market place?

Part of providing better customer service is improving your product. The product you are selling is you. If you are not spending significant amounts of time improving yourself, your competitors will eventually pass you. Jim Rohn says that you need to work as hard on yourself as you do on your job. I believe that doing so will lead you to greatness, both personally and professionally. If you are not investing at least a half an hour in personal development, you will be left behind.

Are we taking the steps to achieve financial independence based on the individual definition?

Everyone has his own definition of what constitutes financial independence. Spend the time to clearly define yours. Invest the time to plan out how you are going to get from where you are today to where you want to be. Too many people fail to plan their future. It has occurred to me that often the agents with the highest gross commission save and invest little or no money. They believe there is always tomorrow, and if they could earn more they could save more. Develop the discipline to save right now, today. Saving does not get easier when the numbers or amounts get bigger. Instead, the want list gets longer because you think you deserve and can afford it. That is what your mind is telling you. Only you control the destiny of your money. You must create a savings plan today.

When other areas in our lives are out of balance we spend to reward ourselves. We spend to make up for shortcomings in our unbalanced lives. We must create a savings and balance plan so we can achieve financial independence. Our goal in life should be to be financially independent. We should all have the desire to amass enough assets to retire comfortably by living off the income or interest they generate. When we get the financial issue out of the way we can really begin to live life to the fullest.